9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Case legislation is specific into the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For illustration, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
fourteen. From the light of your position explained above, it can be concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be considered for no fault of his individual and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the duration of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Ordinarily, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which include People in obvious violation of set up case regulation) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, along with the case is not appealed, the decision will stand.
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner should go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal has not nevertheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may possibly then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
The proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to. Inside the meantime police shall remain neutral within the private dispute between the parties, however, if any in the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall take prompt action against them under regulation. five. The instant petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it is actually quite imprecise about whether the ninety-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based on the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held into the ninety-working day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it's easy to get a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has attained to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has achieved such stage. Read more
10. Without touching the merits on the case of the issue of once-a-year increases within the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, such annual increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, necessitates further assessment for being made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment at the same time. The disparity inside the shell out scale allowances of Stenographers inside the District Judiciary is while in the crystal clear negation of your law laid down with the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender and also the Magistracy is to ensure uk case law summaries a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered from the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.